[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] MX record question / Raq4i
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] MX record question / Raq4i
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 19 11:48:02 2001
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
SM wrote:
> If we were to adhere strictly to the RFCs, then we wouldn't be accepting
> mail from most of these Cobalt boxes. :)
Not true at all. The Cobalt boxes are RFC complaint for email if you
set them up properly. Even DNS is RFC complaiant, it's just not well
explained.
> BTW, why did did you point the MX to domain.com?
The MX record must point the domain for receiving mail to a place that
can receive it.
For example, mail addressed to jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx is served by my
Cobalt RaQ. If I had an A record for mail.nobaloney.net I could create
an MX record pointing to mail.nobaloney.net for incoming mail. I could
also point to any other domain name with an A record for the same
physical machine, since once email gets to the machine it doesn't matter
what domain name was used to get it there.
I don't use mail.nobaloney.net, by the way. I leave it as an exercise
for the reader to find out what I do use and why (hint: use nslookup
from your own RaQ).
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484