[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ4 nslookup doesn't work



> > can you suggest any other way I might
> > approach trying to find out if reverse lookup is broken/fixing it?
>
> nslookup requires that reverse lookup works.
> reverse lookup reqires an in-addr.arpa file
> if you reverse your ip number, say your ip 1.2.3.4
> Then you shoud be able to execute
> dig 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa and get a resonable result.
> In bind these are called PTR records.
> Do you have the book? DNS and BIND?
>
> Gerald
>

I found a file called /etc/named/pri.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.

Here's the dig output [specifics replaced with notes in square brackets]:

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> [my.ip.in.reverse].in-addr.arpa
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 4
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;      [my.ip.in.reverse].in-addr.arpa, type = A, class = IN

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
[first-three-bytes-of-my.ip.in.reverse]..in-addr.arpa.  1D IN SOA
dns0.[my-upstream-provider.net]. dnsmaster.[my-upstream-provider.net].
. (
                                        2001081501      ; serial
                                        3H              ; refresh
                                        1H              ; retry
                                        1W              ; expiry
                                        1D )            ; minimum


;; Total query time: 6 msec
;; FROM: [my-home-URL] to SERVER: default -- [my ip]
;; WHEN: Thu Nov 22 11:37:32 2001
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 44  rcvd: 108


I think I know the book you mean (one of the O'Reilly ones with an animal on
the front?) and no, I haven't got it - I know I should and I'm sure it's
very interesting - but I suppose I was naive enough to think I wouldn't have
to become expert on that to keep a RaQ4 (nothing special) working...

Any further suggestions gratefully received.

By the way I accidently sent half a message in this thread from the wrong
sender's address so it will surface after moderation. Apologies to the list
in advance.

--
Eddie