Re: [cobalt-users] suid perl - 2 month old hazard

[Rusty Wilson <rustyw007@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- flash22@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> As an aside, the Raq2 i looked at, does have neomail on it, I
> am playing with it without +s to see if it really needs it set, I
> suspect
> it doesn't , not sure yet tho...
> 
> gsh
Hi all,

I posted a question that may have gotten lost in a tangent
conversation. Please forgive the repost but I am very interesteed in
hearing what anyone has to offer.

I am running Neomail on one of my RaQ 4i servers, and sure enough the s
bit is set (its not set on any of my other plain vanillia RaQs).

QUESTION:
Is there anything I can do that protects me from the exploit, AND
allows me to keep Neomail running?

--
Rusty


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com