RE: [[cobalt-users] Cobalt RaQ behind firewall]

["Robyn Nixon" <robynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

How did the transition of placing your RAQ behind a firewall with NAT go???
I'm thinking of doing the same.

Robyn L. Nixon
Network Engineer
Asset Networks
robynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
714-379-6234

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Snowy Elf
Sent:	Sunday, April 22, 2001 12:31 AM
To:	cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [[cobalt-users] Cobalt RaQ behind firewall]

Yes, use port forwarding with your firewall to forward ports 80, 21, and 25
to
your internal machine, which can have an address 192.168.xxx.xxx.

Mike Hobbs <mhobbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Has anyone setup a Cobalt RaQ behind a firewall with a "fake" IP?  My
DSL company is going out of business (surprise surprise) and I may end
up with an ISP with only one static IP, so I was thinking of giving my
Cobalt a 192.168.xxx.xxx number, I guess my question to you all is, as
long as I open all the proper ports, will my RaQ still function
normally, web, ftp, email, etc..?

Mike

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users


____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users