Re: [cobalt-users] BIND 8 or BIND 9?

[SteelHead <brk@xxxxxxxx>]

we are, after much discussion, going to go manual and try djbdns.  Let you
know how it works out later.

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] BIND 8 or BIND 9?


> At 6/29/01 09:58 PM -0700, you wrote:
> >Ok, there are two current version out there for BIND right now.  The
thing I
> >was told is "do BIND 8" for security, but I now see that BIND 9 is out
and
> >folks are doing an alpha on 9.2.
> >
> >Is there a reason to do or not do either 8 or 9 on a mips Raq 1==>2
>
> Tell you one thing, BIND has enough security exploits and problems on its
> "stable" released versions that you couldn't pay me to run a BIND alpha on
> a production box. Me, I'd stick with the latest stable release of 8. Don't
> know the state of Cobalt updates for those boxen or how the GUI handles 8.
>
>
> --
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>