[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] A Word About Cobaltracks.Com and Bandwidth Usage
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] A Word About Cobaltracks.Com and Bandwidth Usage
- From: Wayne Sagar <wsagar@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Apr 11 12:58:03 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
>So lets see, three times the min bandwidth of 163.2 kbps is 489.6 kbps, but
>cobaltracks does not even provide the min bandwidth, so what are you really
>getting? Sounds like another classic example of a webhost/dedicated server
>company sales gimmick where you get less than you expected.
How many dedicated providers really do this? I'm with an affiliate of
HostPro and I've seen many occasions where I was able to move data to and
from the server with a T-1 connection from me to it at 1000kbps while a
partner, located in another state was also accessing the system at the same
moment with very good connection speed..
So, at least in this case, the figure given by HostPro (40g per month) is a
total figure allowed under the plan, not a bandwidth limited process.
I looked at your site and your rates look attractive and I wish you luck in
your venture. I did, however, find it difficult to discern exactly what
your backbone connection consists of? How many routes in and out do you use?
Wayne Sagar