[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Reverse Lookup
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Reverse Lookup
- From: shimi <shimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Mar 11 05:37:10 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Reverse resolves doesn't interfere nor help in existance/non existance.
The only reason you would want reverse resolves are that when YOUR server
initiates a connection to ANOTHER server, the other server will know who
you are, instead of seeing the IP address. Also when you connect to other
servers, if there is a resolve, it won't wait for a timeout.
So basically except if you're relaying mail, you don't need reverse DNS
set. (again, not that if you won't do DNS it'll fuck something up. it'll
just be alittle slower, not a big deal)
Best regards,
shimi [mailto:shimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
----
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and BSD.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Just to confirm something...if I'm using the RaQ4 to provide DNS, I need
> to have reverse lookup records for the nameservers, but not for virtual
> hosts?
>
> I think that's what I gleaned from the archive, but, it is early, and I
> haven't gotten my normal 2 hours sleep.
>
> Thanks
>
> thom
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>