[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Bind - a better solution?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Bind - a better solution?
- From: Eurowolf@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri Feb 23 06:26:01 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
In a message dated 2/23/01 7:52:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, chris@xxxxxx
writes:
<< From: chris@xxxxxx (Chris Mason)
I see that Bind 8.2.3 has a reported expoit already, so I am cooncerned
about the security of this daemon. Is it possible to have named start as a
user other than root? THat would help significantly.
Chris Mason
>>
Do you really need to run bind on your machine?
What we do now..after having a few machineshacked into and REHACKED after the
update..is we have 2 cheapy boxes who ONLY run name services...pointing to
the raqs......IN the raqs...IF you do pop email, you do need to the MX record
( Cobalts MX record is a MX + modifications to the sendmail user table !) and
it works like a charm
there is only one user on the dns machines, and who cares if they hack
in..let them...we dont care...worst case is we take one machine ofline,
rebuild it and the other does the 2ndary dns....
but that is only 2 dutch guilders