RE: [cobalt-users] Raq3 patch support needed

["Sean Chester" <seanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

why install the patches at all?

they either dont work (ive been h4ck3d since i installed bind patch)
or they break your config (OS 4.0 broke my virtusertable)


-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of RaQ3
Sent: 15 February 2001 19:27
To: Cobalt Users
Subject: Re:[cobalt-users] Raq3 patch support needed


"Alonso Garcia" <alonsog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 15.02.01 16:57:44:
>
>I have a Raq3 and basic Raq admin experience, haven't done any major 
>changes to it. It holds about 35 small sites. I need to know which 
>updates I got to install and in what order. Only the ones that are a 
>MUST for security or any other reasons and that you feel are safe for 
>a newbie like me. Here's what I already have:
>
>All-Kernel_i386 Release 1.1
>Cobalt OS Release 5.0
>RaQ3-All-Security Release 3.0.1-6750
>RaQ3-All-SystemRelease 3.0.1-5917
>RaQ3-All-System Release 3.0.1-6168
>RaQ3-All-System Release 3.0.1-6449
>RaQ3-All-Security Release 3.0.1-6579
>RaQ3-All-Security Release 3.0.1-6682
>RaQ3-en-OSUpdate Release 3.0
>Webalizer RaQ3/4 (Mermaid Consulting I/S) Release 2.00.12-2

Hi Alonso !

9353 is a MUST due to the latest BIND hacks. You should intall it
ASAP. But why don't you go all the way up to the top of cobalts
list ?  It is always a good idea to keep things current.

Thomas

--
InternAd.de
Internet Advertising
Thomas Prosi
tp@xxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users