RE:[2] [2] [cobalt-users] speaking of spam...

[RaQ3 <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"clayton oliver" <coliver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 08.02.01 14:18:37:
>
>>>It's useful to have a catch-all when many of your clients are too
>>>computer-illiterate to get an email address right (and don't
>>>know what an address book is).
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I really don't think so. If someone is too stupid to type in
>> the correct e-mail-address. So what.
>> The mail bounces, comes back and the sender has to correct
>> his fault. A good method to
>> learn ;-)   On the other hand, if it would not bounce he
>> might spread the wrong address ...
>
>Not stupid, just ignorant.  And you're operating on the incorrect assumption
>that all clients are capable of learning from their mistakes.  My company's
>average end user is a 52-year-old housewife with a third-grade reading
>comprehension level.  On new software installation trips, our personnel
>regularly have to teach new users how to use a mouse.
>
>Given this, it helps us to have a catchall so we can get as much of their
>blindly-flailing email as possible.  YMMV.

Hi Clayton !

You are really a poor guy ;-)))
Avarage: 52 - WOW
Good luck in the future !
Thomas

--
InternAd.de
Internet Advertising
Thomas Prosi
tp@xxxxxxxxxxx