RE:[2] [cobalt-users] speaking of spam...

[RaQ3 <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"clayton oliver" <coliver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 07.02.01 16:33:24:
>
>> Talking of spam, what is it with catch-alls?  Who wants it?
>> We bounce between 200 and 500 emails a day addressed to
>> unknown users.
>
>It's useful to have a catch-all when many of your clients are too
>computer-illiterate to get an email address right (and don't know what an
>address book is).

Hi !

I really don't think so. If someone is too stupid to type in the correct e-mail-address. So what.
The mail bounces, comes back and the sender has to correct his fault. A good method to
learn ;-)   On the other hand, if it would not bounce he might spread the wrong address ...

So far no one could give me a real good reason to use these catch-alls.
Thomas

--
InternAd.de
Internet Advertising
Thomas Prosi
tp@xxxxxxxxxxx