[cobalt-users] Publishing with Frontpage Extension on Qube 2

["Karen Luu" <kluu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

With Frontpage extension I can download the pages as well as upload the
pages, but since I uploaded with username admin, it all goes into
/home/users/admin.  How do it at the right place?  In other words, where
does Apache store the internet sites on the Qube 2?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:38 PM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #2038 - 18 msgs
>
>
> Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
> 	cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: lame server (Rick Ewart)
>    2. Re: Cobalt Wannabe? (Paul)
>    3. Re: Catch All on RAQ4 (Filiberto Ricci)
>    4. RAQ3 won't backup anymore (Matt Syracuse)
>    5. Re: User Limit? Whats the max?
> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?hairy=AE_support_desk?=)
>    6. Domain Name Not Valid RAQ4 (Matt Brown)
>    7. Bind 8 rpms for RaQ2 (Rene Hendrix)
>    8. Catch All on RAQ4 (Matt Brown)
>    9. Qube 2 & majordomo (Jerry Ellis)
>   10. Re: Remote DNS/MX Records <Security> (flash22@xxxxxxx)
>   11. Re: PTR Records (flash22@xxxxxxx)
>   12. RE: FTP and default rights (Eric Arseneau)
>   13. Re: Qube 2 & majordomo (Tim M. Muldoon)
>   14. Re: Bind 8 rpms for RaQ2 (Tim M. Muldoon)
>   15. Re: Catch All on RAQ4-Fixed (baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>   16. Re: lame server (flash22@xxxxxxx)
>   17. Forntpage + Cobalt 4 (Karsten Beijer)
>   18. Re: ftp home directory (flash22@xxxxxxx)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Rick Ewart" <rick@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] lame server
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:50:56 -0500
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Carrie wrote:
> No, seriously. I am getting this "Unusual System Event" (below) in my logs
> every few minutes. I have looked through the archives on this and no one
> seemed to have been able to come up with what it may be - Dan had a guess
> that maybe someone else's DNS was pointing the wrong way.
> I was hoping someone might've figured it out by now.
> -------------------
>
> Hey Carrie.
>
> I personally think its an attack on the server, of some sort, as I get
> several a day. I figured they are trying to solicit info from our servers.
> Note the log file from my machine at the same time....
> Coincidence? I can't
> believe it. There is a 2 minute difference between mine and yours.
>
> I asked everyone about this before as I am trying to understand
> the various
> messages I get from logcheck. The other one I get a lot are "bad
> referrals".
>
> If anyone knows of a resource to learn about log messages, please let me
> know - I have tried everywhere - redhat, cobalt, the archives,
> cert, etc....
> no luck so far. Even my redhat book is useless.
>
> Carrie's Log:
> -----------------
> Jan 30 12:40:32 www named[916]: Lame server on
> '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'
> (in '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'?): [192.67.14.16].53 't.ns.verio.net'
> Jan 30 12:40:32 www named[916]: Lame server on
> '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'
> (in '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'?): [129.250.35.32].53 'b.ns.verio.net'
> Jan 30 12:40:32 www named[916]: ns_forw: query(19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa)
> All possible A RR's lame
>
> My Log:
> -----------
> Jan 30 12:37:58 www named[746]: Lame server on
> '12.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'
> (in '12.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'?): [192.67.14.16].53 't.ns.verio.net'
> Jan 30 12:37:58 www named[746]: Lame server on
> '12.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'
> (in '12.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'?): [129.250.35.32].53 'b.ns.verio.net'
>
>
> Rick Ewart
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Reply-To: "Paul" <paulbentz@xxxxxxxx>
> From: "Paul" <paulbentz@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Cobalt Wannabe?
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:00:30 -0800
>
> Haven't heard of them until now. I checked out their site, and their
> web-based admin is just Webmin and nothing else. Just because the admin
> interface is web-based does NOT make it as easy to use as the Cobalt.
> Now if I really wanted that kind of server, I'd just buy a 1U server case
> and components, load up Webmin (all hardware is easily available
> and Webmin
> is free) and save a couple hundred dollars.
> Paul
>
> >Interesting http://rauchmedien.com/rm_internet.htm
> >Anyone ever heard of them?
> >Laterz
> >Frank
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: "Filiberto Ricci" <filiberto@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Catch All on RAQ4
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:15:00 +0100
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi!
>
> try this setting
>
> set an MX record in the DNS server like this:
> domain.com ---> domain.com
>
>
> Go in the "Site setting" of domain.com and add in the field "Email Server
> Aliases"
> domain.com
>
>
> Now back in the server "control panel".
> Click on parameters of "email server" and chech if there is:
> www.domain.com
> in "Host/Domain Aliases"
>
> if not, add it.
>
> Hope this help,
>
> Filiberto
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:05 AM
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Catch All on RAQ4
>
>
> > Well, feeling really stupid.  Having read the archives ref
> catchall on the
> > Raq4. I thought I had it working....but no, if catchall alias is set to
> > @domain.com, it gets ALL the mail. and the users don't.  If it's set
> > to @www.domain.com, the users get their mail, and the catchall
> > gets bounced.
> >
> > It's obvious that I have my head up my butt on this...but it's too dark
> > for me to see the way out.
> >
> > Open to suggestions, BFH, etc.
> >
> > thom
> >
> >
> ./././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././
> ./././././
> > baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             Thom LaCosta K3HRN Webmaster
> >
> > http://www.baltimoremd.com/             Baltimore's Home Page
> > http://www.baltimorehon.com/            Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
> > http://www.zerobeat.net                 Home of The QRP Web Ring
> >                                         and Drake Mail List Pages
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:21 -0500
> From: Matt Syracuse <syracuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Cobalt-Users <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] RAQ3 won't backup anymore
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Our RAQ3 won't backup - after clicking 'start' for any option (except
> "Select and individual"), the hourglass goes and goes (about 5
> minutes) and
> finally I get a 'This page cannot be displayed' or the hourglass just goes
> away.
>
> Connection is over DSL or Cable
>
> /\/\att
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  Matt Syracuse
>  Director of Information Technology
>  MedNet Technologies, Inc
>  1975 Linden Blvd.
>  Elmont, NY 11003
>  516-285-2200 x307
>  http://www.mednet-tech.com
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?hairy=AE_support_desk?= <ski@xxxxxxx>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?hairy=AE_support_desk?= <ski@xxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] User Limit? Whats the max?
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:12:08 -0800
>
> Best posting yet....very sharp...
>
> thanx!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jflittle <jflittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] User Limit? Whats the max?
>
>
> > All depends on how heavy she is !!!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Clint Decker <nim1998@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] User Limit? Whats the max?
> >
> >
> > > Does any one know if there is a limit?  I want to do it on the raq.
> > >
> > > CLint
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeff Lasman" <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:00 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] User Limit? Whats the max?
> > >
> > >
> > > Clint Decker wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have about 4500 subscribers as of now, but its always growing.
> > > > Im currently using BigMailBox as a free web mail service, but their
> > > services
> > > > arnt high enough quality to offer to my customers, so I
> wanted to make
> > my
> > > > own.
> > >
> > > If you're at 4500 subscribers and growing, then you need a
> high-capacity
> > > solution designed for email.  You can do it yourself (the and
> growing is
> > > what gets to me; I'd start at about 800mHz, 1 gig of memory) or have
> > > someone build one for you (we can do that but only as your consultant,
> > > we're NOT in the box reselling business).
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > > --
> > > Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > nobaloney.net
> > > P. O. Box 52672
> > > Riverside, CA  92517
> > > voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Reply-To: <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Matt Brown" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Domain Name Not Valid RAQ4
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 02:36:38 -0000
>
> Adam,
>
> Are you subscribed to the Cobalt Announcement list ? If not you need to..
> you will be notified by email of any new fixes/patches.
>
> They have made a fix for this problem and it can be downloaded from
>
> http://emea.cobalt.com/support/download/raq4.eng.html
>
> "Due to new standards, double dashes are now allowed in domain names.
> The code has been changed to allow users to have domain names such as
> abc--123.com."
>
> Update: Domain Names 1.0.1 / RaQ4-All-System-1.0.1-8572.pkg
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Matt Brown
> Designs 2 Web
>
>
> >Reply-To: "Adam Daniel" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >From: "Adam Daniel" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:10:38 -0800
> >Organization: The Casino Company
> >Subject: [cobalt-users] Domain Name Not Valid RAQ4
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >I apologize if this is a topic covered previously, I am new to this group
> >and could not find a reference to this problem in the archived material.
> >
> >I am trying to add a new domain to our RAQ4 the domain has two dash's .
> >E.G.  www.my--domain.com
> >
> >the GUI is telling me that this domain name is not valid. The box will
> >accept one dash but not two, is this a bug and if so is there a fix
> >available.
> >
> >Thanks for any help anyone may offer.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Adam Daniel
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:56:52 -0800
> From: Rene Hendrix <rhendrix@xxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: Rene Hendrix <rhendrix@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Bind 8 rpms for RaQ2
>
> As promised we are releaseing the Bind 8 rpms for Raq2.
>
> These RPMS have not been throughly tested by Quality Assurance, and
> it is reccomended that you do not install these if you are not
> familiar with rpm.
>
> Again, we expect these to be available in pkg format shortly.
>
> Location:
> ***  Please note that these rpms are not for the Qube2,
> ***  these will be release shortly
> ftp://ftp/cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/mips/raq2/bind-8.2.3
> -C1.mips.rpm
> ftp://ftp/cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/mips/raq2/bind-devel
> -8.2.3-C1.mips.rpm
> ftp://ftp/cobaltnet.com/pub/experimental/RPMS/mips/raq2/bind-utils
> -8.2.3-C1.mips.rpm
>
> MD5 sums:
> MD5 (bind-8.2.3-C1.mips.rpm) = 2e11616c150c2d7dc59a22c099df8d72
> MD5 (bind-devel-8.2.3-C1.mips.rpm) = 43705b766b91cb95b4e503cec28616ca
> MD5 (bind-utils-8.2.3-C1.mips.rpm) = e1f30059a3c06e8b7c29362a44d8f8bc
>
> Please direct any comments or questions about these rpms to me.
>
> -Rene Hendrix
>
> --
> Rene Hendrix
> Sun Microsystems
> Server Appliance Business Unit
> rhendrix@xxxxxxx
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Reply-To: <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Matt Brown" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Catch All on RAQ4
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 02:44:26 -0000
>
> Hi Thom,
>
> No I think you are using the correct format, I have a Raq4i and I
> set up all
> new accounts with a catchall type email account.
>
> I use @www.domainname.com and it works fine.
>
> Then if an account holder adds a new user to his/her account they
> simply add
> the name
> of the user e.g tony and everything except Tony's mail is sent to the
> catchall account.
>
> Be assured it does work.
>
> Regards
>
> Matt Brown
> Designs 2 Web
>
>
> >From: baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:05:07 -0500 (EST)
> >To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [cobalt-users] Catch All on RAQ4
> >Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >Well, feeling really stupid.  Having read the archives ref
> catchall on the
> >Raq4. I thought I had it working....but no, if catchall alias is set to
> >@domain.com, it gets ALL the mail. and the users don't.  If it's set
> >to @www.domain.com, the users get their mail, and the catchall
> >gets bounced.
> >
> >It's obvious that I have my head up my butt on this...but it's too dark
> >for me to see the way out.
> >
> >Open to suggestions, BFH, etc.
> >
> >thom
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:16:24 -0600
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Jerry Ellis <jellis@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Qube 2 & majordomo
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I have been doing tech support for dial-up users for an ISP for 2 1/2
> years. I just wanted to state right away that my brain has turned to mush
> and I must apologize if I don't make any sense.
>
> Background:
>
> My customer has a Qube 2, Cobalt OS Release 4.0,
> Qube2-All-Security Release
> 3.0.1-6453, Qube2-en-OSUpdate Release 3.0
>
> I am trying to hack majordomo and discovered that if I use a
> list_name.config file I can make majordomo behave in a desired way. I've
> also discovered that config_parse.pl will trash the list_name.config file
> if one makes any changes to the list with the web interface.
> Fine, we won't
> use the web interface for list administration.
>
> The problem:
>
> That being said, if I send an email to majordomo from a user
> (Qube or not)
> with the request subscribe list_name, the user gets a reply from
> majordomo
> telling him that the request has been sent to the list owner for
> approval.
> However, the list owner (admin) never gets the email from
> majordomo asking
> for approval. I can send an approval from any account and subscribe or
> unsubscribe a user and the change gets made. The subscriber even gets the
> welcome message from majordomo. But for some reason majordomo
> will not send
> mail to the admin account..
>
> I've searched the majordomo.cf and sendmail files looking for something
> that would send the responses elsewhere including aliases but everything
> points to the admin. I can send mail to and from the admin account so I'm
> thinking it is okay.
>
> I've search the majordomo FAQs, the Cobalt Knowledge Base, the
> this mailing
> list's archives but can't find anything. I know very little about
> majordomo
> and Linux and I'm hoping someone will take pity on me and point me in the
> right direction. :)
>
> Jerry
>
> Jerry Ellis
> Tech Support
> Cumberland Internet
> www.rr1.net
>
> Mountain Dew and doughnuts... because breakfast is the most
> important meal
> of the day!
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> From: flash22@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:51:17 -0500 (EST)
> Reply-To: flash22@xxxxxxx
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Remote DNS/MX Records <Security>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Craig Napier wrote:
>
> > I'm curious if anyone knows of any outright problems in
> allowing users to
> > control their own DNS/MX records while hosting their domain's on your
> > systems? I seem to be getting more and more users wanting to
> control their
> > own DNS/MX records through all these little add-ons they get from these
> > registers nowadays... Is allowing this practice a good or bad idea <and
> > why>..?
>
>  They can corrupt your own nameserver records if they collide ns records,
> they can setup a domain with no reference to you and spam the net, and
> your isp will get all the complaints instead of you because noone will be
> able to easily figure out who hosts them, they will probably not
> understand how to do it properly and will blame you when their web site
> doesn't work properly, they will call you on the phone 20 times trying
> to figure out how to do it properly and you will end up doing it for
> them enyway..bind on the raq runs as root ...so you weaken
> security whenever you release control over any aspect of it...if they loop
> MX records it's your mail server that gets bombed...
>
> Only good reason that comes to mind is that reasonably advanced users can
> do something themselves that would take you about 2 minutes to do...
>
> ok, i'm a little pessamistic on users in general, i'll admit, but it has
> to do a little with some who call me up and yell when the internet dies,
> when their unrelated internal mail server blows it's cookies...when they
> download the latest greatest virus...these are not people i'd let anywhere
> near something as critical to the server as dns ;0
>
> 10cents...
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> From: flash22@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:08:55 -0500 (EST)
> Reply-To: flash22@xxxxxxx
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] PTR Records
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > I've been told by a RaQ4 owner with a large number of name-based sites
> > that enabling PTR records in the RaQ DNS can cause problems.
> >
> > Is that correct, or some type of Cobalt myth?
>
> No, PTR records can cause problems if the PTR is a domain name that is
> used as the target of an email address, sendmail will lookup the PTR and
> rewrite the address, if there is a MX from that address back to the PTR
> domain, then sendmail goees into spastic loops ;)
>
> ex: mail.foo.com PTR foo.com
>     foo.com MX mail.foo.com
>
> will cause loops....(but using an A record for mail.foo.com makes
> everything happy, even if it's IP is the same as the IP for foo.com)
>
> You can use PTR's for other things fine however, there's nothing weird
> about DNS on the raq, just a bit of touchiness with sendmail+virtual users
>
> I would note however that the general rule for using PTR is that you use
> it only when you can't possably use anything else ;)
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> From: "Eric Arseneau" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Cobalt-Users@List. Cobalt. Com" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] FTP and default rights
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:18:58 -0800
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I should have said that I have checked that, and the Umask value is 002 as
> it is, but the files and dirs get created with group off.
>
> Does this make sense or is something else the matter ?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of flash22@xxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:40 PM
> > To: Cobalt-Users@List. Cobalt. Com
> > Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] FTP and default rights
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Eric Arseneau wrote:
> >
> > > This may be an obvious question, but here goes.  I've got a
> > site setup with
> > > a couple of admins.  I would like them all to be able to read
> > and write to
> > > any of the files and dirs on that site.  The problem is that
> > when one admin
> > > uploads stuff using ftp, the default is to set themselves as
> > owner and only
> > > have read priviliges for the group.
> > >
> > > How do I make it such that if any of the admins put files in,
> > that the group
> > > also gets write privileges automatically ?
> >
> > look in proftpd.conf for Umask, it determines the file permisions set by
> > default (but they are inverted from the umask value) so for example
> > umask 022 gives you rw-r--r-- and 002 gives you rw-rw-r--
> >
> > note that the umask that appears before the <VirtualHost lines
> if for the
> > entire server...put a new Umask in the Virtuallhost block if you want to
> > just change it for one site/IP (remember all sites sharing IP's get that
> > setting)
> >
> > Be *very* carefull if you allow anonymous ftp, ;)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> Reply-To: "Tim M. Muldoon" <muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Tim M. Muldoon" <muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Qube 2 & majordomo
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:44:29 -0500
>
> > I've searched the majordomo.cf and sendmail files looking for something
> > that would send the responses elsewhere including aliases but everything
> > points to the admin. I can send mail to and from the admin
> account so I'm
> > thinking it is okay.
>
> I know this may not be the most sophisticated way, but send a
> piece of mail
> to the list, look at your clock then look through the timestamps on all of
> the files in the majordomo subdirectory.
>
> This should at least give you an idea of what files get modified when you
> send the mail or log entries for the list.
>
> Tim
> muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Reply-To: "Tim M. Muldoon" <muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Tim M. Muldoon" <muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Bind 8 rpms for RaQ2
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:29:34 -0500
>
> > Please direct any comments or questions about these rpms to me.
> >
> > -Rene Hendrix
>
> That is what we like to see, somebody at Sun stepping up to the plate.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> From: baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:14:34 -0500 (EST)
> To: Filiberto Ricci <filiberto@xxxxxxxxx>
> cc: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Catch All on RAQ4-Fixed
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Filiberto Ricci wrote:
>
> > Hope this help,
>
> Boy...Did it!  I really appreciate the information...worked like a charm,
> AND all my autoresponders, forwarding and other procmail goodies are
> alive and well!
>
> Thanks ever so much!
>
> Thom
> ps, I quoted your text again, so that if anyone else had the problem, they
> would be able to get the information knowing it had fixed the problem.
>
> >
> > set an MX record in the DNS server like this:
> > domain.com ---> domain.com
>
> > Go in the "Site setting" of domain.com and add in the field
> "Email Server
> > Aliases" domain.com
> >
> > Now back in the server "control panel".
> > Click on parameters of "email server" and chech if there is:
> > www.domain.com in "Host/Domain Aliases" if not, add it.
>
> ./././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././
> ./././././
> baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             Thom LaCosta K3HRN Webmaster
>
> http://www.baltimoremd.com/             Baltimore's Home Page
> http://www.baltimorehon.com/            Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
> http://www.zerobeat.net                 Home of The QRP Web Ring
>                                         and Drake Mail List Pages
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> From: flash22@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:00:49 -0500 (EST)
> Reply-To: flash22@xxxxxxx
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] lame server
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rick Ewart wrote:
> > I personally think its an attack on the server, of some sort, as I get
> > Jan 30 12:40:32 www named[916]: Lame server on
> '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'
> > (in '19.66.241.207.in-addr.arpa'?): [192.67.14.16].53 't.ns.verio.net'
>
> I'd have been inclined to think you were just seeing an odd coincidence,
> but i have one also, 6 minutes later....interesting
>
> The other interesting thing is i have no record in any other log file for
> this ip address, so it's not a web hit , seems more like someone asked the
> nameserver...
>
> Wonder if there's some nifty hack involving delegating a ptr back to
> localhost...
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:03:04 -0800 (PST)
> From: Karsten Beijer <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Forntpage + Cobalt 4
>
> I have a problem with FP and uploading FP.
> The raq do not remember the password an userneme if you will
> upload in FP. siteadmin and FTP is oke!
>
> I have installed the update 1.0
>
> can someone help me?
>
> karsten
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Deze e-mail is verzonden met EasyWebMail
> http://www.easywebmail.nl
> Easyhosting Internetdiensten
> http://www.easyhosting.nl
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 18
> From: flash22@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:17:59 -0500 (EST)
> Reply-To: flash22@xxxxxxx
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] ftp home directory
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, H.P. Stroebel wrote:
>
> > Jeff Lasman schrieb:
> >
> > > On your Qube, maybe.  Not on my RaQs; it's stored in /home/spool/mail.
> >
> > i have a raq (3i), and on mine it`s var/spool/mail. strange.
>
> Quota is defined per mount point, i'd guess that's why /home/...
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> End of cobalt-users Digest
>