[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] 2 domains one website
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] 2 domains one website
- From: "Zeffie" <cobaltlist@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jan 23 11:26:08 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> >> Using this technique you can add sites by hand that will be completely
> >> invisible to the gui.
> >>
> >> So the gui's limitations don't apply. So yes, you could have 1,000
> >> small sites on your RaQ.
> >
> >Wrong jeff.
> >
> >He would be running into resource limitations.
>
> Zeffie, you're sure that the number of sites on a Raq3, for instance,
> would affect the file descriptors limit? I ask, and I'm sure I'm
> missing something, because I thought file descriptors mainly assign
> to processes like logging and listening (per IP)? And the Raq3
> doesn't have that problem since it distributes from central server
> logs -- requiring the one descriptor per log process.
right.... instead of 200 logs you would only have 1 which has 1 log. but if
you add 200 sites then you just nulled that advantage.
> I've had boxes running Apache and Unix (which also has a file
> descriptor limit) where there were several hundred virtual sites. Is
> this a "directory structure" issue of some kind? What am I missing?
> Alfredo
I forgot to put a reffrence before and I think it will help you...
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#fdlim
Zeffie