RE: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] RaQ Colocation

[David Etheridge <DavidE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That is one thing that concerns me with Cobalt Racks. So far they have
refused to send me any official agreement for the server with regards
acceptable content, guaranteed uptime etc.

Dave 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eurowolf@xxxxxxx [mailto:Eurowolf@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 14 November 2000 13:10
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] RaQ Colocation


In a message dated 11/14/00 8:01:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, oguz@xxxxxxx 
writes:

<< daniel> 
 daniel> http://www.cobaltrack.com - even cheaper than $200 a month, tech
 daniel> support's good and quite a few people on this list seem to use
them.
 daniel> 
 
 But   "de2.net" is only 99 DM = 44 USD/month
 "uk2.net" is only 25 Pound = 36 USD/month 
 
 So why I would pay 200 USD/month ? >>

>>

because support is extra
and you are limited what content you can put up, do you want your provider
to 
be able to switch off your machine, w/o warning if they dont like the
content 
of any of your wesites/clients?   

we dont look to the content :)  so why should they ?

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users