Re: [cobalt-users] 250 site limit URGENT HELP REQUIRED

["Fathi Said" <fathi@xxxxxx>]

I am biased, so those who mind please stop reading now.

> P.S. I will have several Raq1 and Raq2 servers for sell at end of month.

<angry>

I had more than a hard life with these crap servers, and they cost me more
than a fortune in refunding dissatisfied clients.
Cobalts should have a downtime guarantee, who else agrees?
i mean, just compare the specs:
http://www.iopliance.com/iopliancecomparecobalt.shtml

Just Compare!! I can tell you from my own experience, the machines rock. I
have three now, and will be purchasing three more to switch from the cobalts
on Monday. Why? Because I am tired of the cobalts crap servers ruining my
business.

I feel IOPLIANCE is best for me and for my company. I do not even need to
call, i have three ICQ contacts who help me out anytime, and real fast. NO
MORE 3 HOURS WAITING hanging on phone waiting for cobalt to move their asses
and answer, and then say "it is going to be redirected to higher levels,".
WHO higher levels? Duh!
dear cobalt, the higher levels never called me back!

As to david holt, he is one of the best reps i have ever worked with.
Problems get taken care of immediately, i am being notified about the status
anytime i want, and yes, they actually solved all issues i ever had with
their servers. Fortunately I must admit that i only had a simple problem so
far, and everything is working FINE!!!

No servers crashing, no server to baby sit and reboot every 2 hours, no
people complaining about a malfunctioning pop-before-relay and shitty server
performance, no CPU usage of 90% when you run a simple search script.
COMPLETE redudancy?

My company will have 13 RaQ2 servers for sale in three weeks. Who the heck
knows i might as well give them away for free, as crap hardly sells. Anyone
who really wants to take them? I would not.

</angry>

Fathi


> > David Holt wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.iopliance.com offers a dual server in same case and is only
> 13
> > > inches deep, and uses Intel's CPU and all. That is 80 servers per
rack.
> And
> > > the beauty is, that each server in the case is independent of the
other,
> so
> > > you could have Linux on side 1 and NT on side 2. This saves a lot on
co
> > > location fees. But doubles your profit on Rentals of them and starting
> out
> > > with a P3 600, that is fast. I just bought one, and I love it. Europa2
> > >
> > > David