[cobalt-users] (no subject)

[Chip <chip@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Well, once you've dealt with the actual problem, I should think that
>> letting a bunch of people who administer Raq servers know who this person
>> is might be a good thing. That way, no one who reads this list will get
>> stung by the same guy.

>Bad idea, defamation of character unless you already convicted him of it..

Actually not true.  Truth or facts are an affirmative defense for claims of 
defamation.  And one can even mention that someone is accused of something, 
as long as one says "so-and-so is alleged to have locked Joe Schmow out of 
their Raq system before leaving employment."

And one could certainly, without any risk, state "so-and-so worked for 
me.  He did not leave on amicable terms. He would not be eligible for 
rehire"  and that would definitely get the message across.

I just strongly feel that people who are that destructive deserve to have 
their deeds be known.