[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: blocking software
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: blocking software
- From: Johan-Kristian Wold <jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Jun 14 01:48:35 2000
In cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #950, Yohans Mendoza wrote:
hi all,
what are isp's using to block porno to their clients when they request it?
I'm interested on server side solutions rahter than clinet side such as
net nanny and cyberpatrol.
Hello, Yohans.
I'm a bit sceptical to filtering software, since, in essence not
enough gets blocked, and too much is blocked. I.e. you won't be able
to filter everything that should be filtered, and some content that
should be allowed gets filtered.
In addition, very many of these blocking lists seem to have other
agendas in addition to blocking what they should block - i.e.
blocking information sites for gays and lesbians, abortion sites etc
under completely different categories.
Some thoughts on this can be found on <http://www.eff.org>, for
instance
<http://www.eff.org/pub/Censorship/Academic_edu/Library_filtering/HTML/19981214_ifea_nclis_statement.html>
That said - on to your question: Filtering like you want is usually
done in a proxy server or in a firewall. To make the proxy server
method effective, the firewall should shunt all web requests via the
proxy server.
The Watchguard LiveSecurity System (firewall) has built-in content
filtering abilities, that implements the CyberPatrol list.
For more info, look at <http://www.watchguard.com/products/webblock.asp>.
I can't really give you info on any other systems, since I'm not
familiar with them. You might check if the CacheRaQ has any
provisions for this...
Kind regards
Johan-Kristian
--
Johan-Kristian Wold, M.Sc. |
Computer systems administrator | Recursive: Adj. See recursive.
Nor-Trykk Narvik AS |
jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx | SAM007HM02