[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unnecessary Bitch (WAS: Re: [cobalt-users] Symb. Link)
- Subject: Re: Unnecessary Bitch (WAS: Re: [cobalt-users] Symb. Link)
- From: "[Your Site Here] Mark Baker" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Jun 7 10:19:50 2000
- Organization: Your Site Here
Hi,
Oh HA HA!!
Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Site Here - The Total Internet Solution!
http://www.yoursitehere.co.uk
Tel: 020 8786 0540
Fax: 070 808 10995
Mobile: 07977 688818
------------------------------------------------------------------
Enquiries: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sales: sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Accounts: accounts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Support: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hosting from £40/year
Domains from £23.50/year
------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Pfeifer <dpfeifer@xxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Unnecessary Bitch (WAS: Re: [cobalt-users] Symb. Link)
> Shit, what's that for a fuckin' long footer!
> ;-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "[Your Site Here] Mark Baker" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 6:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Unnecessary Bitch (WAS: Re: [cobalt-users] Symb. Link)
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I totally agree, having the past message is great! It means we know
whats
> > going on!!!
> >
> > Give him a break!
> >
> > Mark Baker
> > www.yoursitehere.co.uk
> >
> > p.s DON'T even think of complaining that I put the past message below!!
:-)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Your Site Here - The Total Internet Solution!
> > http://www.yoursitehere.co.uk
> > Tel: 020 8786 0540
> > Fax: 070 808 10995
> > Mobile: 07977 688818
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Enquiries: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sales: sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Accounts: accounts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Support: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hosting from £40/year
> > Domains from £23.50/year
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Brian Curtis <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Unnecessary Bitch (WAS: Re: [cobalt-users] Symb. Link)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dom Latter" <d.latter@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > > Please *trim* your posts, and reply after the quote.
> > >
> > > I'm usually not one to bitch, but WTF are you jumping on my case for
and
> > > telling me how I should construct my reply posts!?
> > >
> > > I included the original message, all 5 lines of the damn thing (excuse
me,
> > > 10 lines or so including the header - so sue me), in case someone
wanted
> > to
> > > know what the question was. That's hardly 'against the rules' that I
know
> > > of.
> > >
> > > And what's this 'reply after the quote' crap? I know of past
'netiquette'
> > > posts that state you should post your reply *BEFORE* the original
message
> > > (search the archives). Makes sense to me since you don't want to have
to
> > > scroll down a ongoing thread to see the latest reply, unless it'd be
more
> > > appropriate to include your responses peppered throughout the original
> > post,
> > > or if you have a lengthy response to a short post (this one for
example).
> > > Then locating your reply after the original post, to allow the reader
to
> > > grasp the gist of the thread, seems like a good idea (all of which I
just
> > > said has been discussed in the past).
> > >
> > > Now if I had included an entire digest of messages, several previous
> > > off-topic posts, or posted in HTML (all of which has been done before,
and
> > > first time offenders politely corrected), then I can see a reason to
> > bitch.
> > > Other than that, I think most people on this list will agree that my
post
> > > was most appropriate in layout. For Christ's sake, the entire post
> > > _including the original message w/ headers_ fit on one screen w/o a
scroll
> > > bar.
> > >
> > > The 'offending' post with my reply can be found at:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-June/012856.html
> > >
> > > Give me a friggin break.
> > >
> > > BC
> > >
> > > P.S. (Mr. Latter, don't bother to send a reply to me, you have been
added
> > to
> > > my 'Shit Mail' filter.)
> > > P.P.S. (To those of you who are easily offended by off-color language,
my
> > > sincerest apologies. I also apologize for _my_ 'Unnecessary Bitch', I
> > just
> > > couldn't let it go for some reason. Time to lay off the coffee.)
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users