[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] Real World Qube 2 and such



Jens Kristian Søgaard wrote:
> 
> Dom Latter <d.latter@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > The short answer is no.  When people look up say www.san.com, then this
> > human-friendly address is resolved into 194.201.254.222.  How this happens
> > is non-trivial, and the process does kindof expect the IP address (the one
> > with numbers) not to change every five minutes.
> 
> Well, not exactly. You just need to set the TTL value low enough -

Which is why the very next line of my post read:

"No doubt somebody will now say that it is *technically* possible..."

> something like 30 seconds or similar. This will work all most
> everywhere (although you can't say about something like AOL and their
> weird DNS servers).

Setting TTL so low without good reason is verging on net abuse, IMHO.
And yes, it won't work for at least one very large pseudo-ISP, as I 
understand it.

> It isn't exactly like you changing ip-adresses every fifth minute,
> just because it's dynamically generated. On a xDSL line you can
> probably hold on to your ip for days or weeks.

But how long would you hold on to your account, once the ISP realises
you're running servers on a cable modem line?

Relevant terms here are "aggregation", "shared bandwidth", and "business
model".  If you want real bandwidth, you have to pay for it - and it's
expensive.

Even if you are allowed to do it by the ISP, you will not be getting 
quality of service.