[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Real World Qube 2 and such
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Real World Qube 2 and such
- From: Dom Latter <d.latter@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu May 25 07:37:15 2000
Jens Kristian Søgaard wrote:
>
> Dom Latter <d.latter@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > The short answer is no. When people look up say www.san.com, then this
> > human-friendly address is resolved into 194.201.254.222. How this happens
> > is non-trivial, and the process does kindof expect the IP address (the one
> > with numbers) not to change every five minutes.
>
> Well, not exactly. You just need to set the TTL value low enough -
Which is why the very next line of my post read:
"No doubt somebody will now say that it is *technically* possible..."
> something like 30 seconds or similar. This will work all most
> everywhere (although you can't say about something like AOL and their
> weird DNS servers).
Setting TTL so low without good reason is verging on net abuse, IMHO.
And yes, it won't work for at least one very large pseudo-ISP, as I
understand it.
> It isn't exactly like you changing ip-adresses every fifth minute,
> just because it's dynamically generated. On a xDSL line you can
> probably hold on to your ip for days or weeks.
But how long would you hold on to your account, once the ISP realises
you're running servers on a cable modem line?
Relevant terms here are "aggregation", "shared bandwidth", and "business
model". If you want real bandwidth, you have to pay for it - and it's
expensive.
Even if you are allowed to do it by the ISP, you will not be getting
quality of service.