[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Planned execution of a script on a RAQ - AT not there ?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Planned execution of a script on a RAQ - AT not there ?
- From: "Zeffie" <cobaltlist@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed May 12 23:12:01 2004
- Organization: Electronic Consultants Inc.
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> Yes, we always drop previous changelog when porting packages.
> In the world where only few guys know magic to read it there's no need
> in changelog.
> We keep it only for ourselves, but as detailed as we can, to keep track
> of all changes made.
> So it's not short for me :)
>
seems like a bit of extra work and it does rather take away from the credit
the people deserve.
> > Starting and stopping
> > services has been cast out by the powers that be... ie: we don't
> > start and stop stuff anymore...
>
> I know that everything except "condrestart" is a taboo.
> I broke those rules here just not to explain how to start daemons.
> This package isn't in repository - so it's allowed. And again, it
> doesn't break anything.
well thats what we have that wonderful pkg format for...
> > Also.. we don't have "service" so you
> > need to re-write that part to the full path to the init... also..
>
> Yeah, came from the original package. Will fix, thanks.
>
> > it's handy to keey the release number intact so the parent can be
> > identified...
>
> Yes, it's handy and this is huge topic for discussion.
> There's one rule about that we have here: if you just backport a
> package, keep original release number in "Release:" field, if you are
> going to maintain the package yourself - feel free to set up your own.
> 95% of repository packages specs are taken from existing packages from
> ALT, Fedora, Mdk, etc. Their patches are not commonly backported
> without good reasons /securtity,memleaks and other cruel bugs/. So no
> point in adding original release number.
>
:) lol... good luck
sorry no classes here... have fun!...
> And again, who needs to know package source? It either works, wither
> doesn't. It's not big distro with number of developers. It's cobalt.
people that work on the server besides yourself
> If you want to know the source, it's not secret, it's taken from
> fedora-devel, at-3.1.8-49.src.rpm
>
> WBR
> Dmitry
scarry... you should really watch that... and note the patch between
versions that they changed their minds on... lol... good luck...
Zeffie... "Get your Z's with Zeffie" 734-454-9117
Cobalt RaQ Repairs, Development, and Maintenance.
Cobalt Spam Filter, Security, Firewall, Anti Virus Products
http://www.cobaltupdates.com Updates for Cobalt Servers
http://www.wordassassin.com/ Wordassassin Authorized Dealer
http://www.zeffie.net/ Free pkg and rpm resources for the Cobalt user
http://www.zeffie.com/ Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ rpms