[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Planned execution of a script on a RAQ - AT not there ?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Planned execution of a script on a RAQ - AT not there ?
- From: Dmitry Alexeyev <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue May 11 14:11:01 2004
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> > You can try installing at from RPMs:
> >
> > rpm -ivh http://www.cobaltsupport.com/RPMS/at-3.1.8-cs1.i386.rpm
> > rpm --rebuild
> > http://www.cobaltsupport.com/SRPMS/at-3.1.8-cs1.src.rpm Dmitry
>
> Well this is close... I see you adjusted the init via the
> changelog... the changelog seems kinda short??
Yes, we always drop previous changelog when porting packages.
In the world where only few guys know magic to read it there's no need
in changelog.
We keep it only for ourselves, but as detailed as we can, to keep track
of all changes made.
So it's not short for me :)
> Starting and stopping
> services has been cast out by the powers that be... ie: we don't
> start and stop stuff anymore...
I know that everything except "condrestart" is a taboo.
I broke those rules here just not to explain how to start daemons.
This package isn't in repository - so it's allowed. And again, it
doesn't break anything.
> Also.. we don't have "service" so you
> need to re-write that part to the full path to the init... also..
Yeah, came from the original package. Will fix, thanks.
> it's handy to keey the release number intact so the parent can be
> identified...
Yes, it's handy and this is huge topic for discussion.
There's one rule about that we have here: if you just backport a
package, keep original release number in "Release:" field, if you are
going to maintain the package yourself - feel free to set up your own.
95% of repository packages specs are taken from existing packages from
ALT, Fedora, Mdk, etc. Their patches are not commonly backported
without good reasons /securtity,memleaks and other cruel bugs/. So no
point in adding original release number.
And again, who needs to know package source? It either works, wither
doesn't. It's not big distro with number of developers. It's cobalt.
If you want to know the source, it's not secret, it's taken from
fedora-devel, at-3.1.8-49.src.rpm
WBR
Dmitry