RE: [cobalt-users] Lists Interlinking?

["Dan Kriwitsky" <list3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> May be there is a better solution?
> 
> Cluster the lists.
> 
> Fail-over achieved, EVERY one wanting to participate in 
> maintaining them is involved, no posting to multiple lists 
> needed, centralized db, load balancing.
> 
> There could be a additional lists for cobalt-like HW, general 
> Unix info etc. I have spent years administering everything 
> except Unixes. This list(s) could be a great promo for open 
> source, which will absolutelly attractive to the world.

There are already a ton of established Unix/Linux lists. I signed up for
a Cobalt users list, not a general Unix/Linux admin list. If I want
that, I would sign up for such a list elsewhere.

> 
> Why argue who will be the owner? The community will be the 
> owner, seniors would be moderators.

A giraffe is a horse designed by committee.
 
> 
> Thus we would be THE LIST. Let's use our own computer 
> techniques: centralized administration... (read above and add 
> your imagination)
> 
> Hope this will not start another List War.

There's no need. The list is up an running on the new server.

http://lists.qbalt.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
-- 
C2003 Dan Kriwitsky

Please reply to the list only. Off list replies are not read.