[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] 2nd IP



On Wednesday 17 March 2004 10:51 am, Bruce Timberlake wrote:

> Yes, but that won't be a "true" secondary nameserver... it's just the
> primary responding to all requests...

Which is the only way to do it, since another copy of bind would have to 
run on another port.  Which would make it completely unreachable.

> I guess technically you can't have a secondary server running on the
> same box as the primary... kinda defeats the purpose.

On that we agree; see my other response to this thread.

Jeff
-- 
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA  92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html";