[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: RaQ 4 PKG "howto"
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: RaQ 4 PKG "howto"
- From: Bruce Timberlake <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Feb 11 17:31:01 2004
- Organization: BRTNet.org
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Sun's pkg approach to linux is evil! You will end up with bunch of
[stupid] unresolved dependencies and totally incompatable 3-rd party
software.
Why is that a PKG specific problem?
Using RPM packages is the right path, that's Linux after all, time to
stop clicking the mouse.
Well, any sort of package handler is good; RPM has its strong and weak
points, just like .deb, etc.
RPM is designed to check versions, architectures, dependencies. Why
putting them into stupid tarballs, arm with stupid scripts with
--nodeps/--noscripts/--force?
To make it easier for non-admins to install upgrades without having to know
how to work a shell, etc.
You don't have to put RPMS in a PKG, you can have it just contain a shell
script or a tarball of content (maybe web pages or something). Then you can
roll out the "update" to all your servers automatically via Control
Station, etc., and be sure that the command will be executed as you want,
and have a record in the UI that the PKG was installed/run/whatever. Or
have a less-skilled admin do the point-click via the UI and manually
upgrade boxes one at a time.
If you don't like it the PKG mechanism, don't use it.