Re: [cobalt-users] Secondary Authorative NameServer for a Domain on RaQ4

["Al-Juhani" <aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx>]

> It _could_ make a difference, depending on which version of named you're 
> running, and on whether or not you limit where zone transfers can go 
> and where they can come from.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Because the nameserver will always respond with the main IP# of the box, 
> no matter what IP# it's contacted on.
> 
> We stopped using multiple IP#s for virtual nameservers as soon as the 
> registries allowed it; it makes it a lot easier to administer the most 
> recent versions of named.
> 
> (Remember that since your version of named could change, something that 
> works now could stop working later, long after you've forgotten the 
> details.)

Jeff,

Thanks .

Well I have some few virtual ns and I was thinking to point back to them
from secondary ..

But my current setup is only using the server main IP address and so
far that is working fine .  

Bind on both server is 8, the standard Cobalt RaQ4 named.

Thanks

Al-Juhani
aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx