[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions
- From: "Stephen Sloan" <ssloan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Mar 30 08:40:00 2000
David
We use the Qube as a corporate information server. We have it running our
email, discussions, web page and other web-based services. Our Qube 2 has
been in service for over one year and works very well for us. A Qube
specific list is at qube-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stephen Sloan
MINCO Corporation
http://www.mincocorp.com
Comprehensive Real Estate Services
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Mitchell" <dnm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Cobalt" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 10:53 AM
Subject: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions
> I am new to the list (2 days) and am considering a Qube2 for
> my company's new facility. Judging from the minute number of
> posts to this list regarding the Qube, I can only assume that
> either the Qube is MUCH more stable than the RAQ, it is much
> less complex than the RAQ, there are MANY less units in use,
> the sheer volumn of RAQ posts scares Qube users away, some
> combination of the above, or there is some other reason that
> I am unaware of.
>
> Please feel free to enlighten me.
>
> David Mitchell
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>