RE: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions

["Jeff Newman" <mjeffn@xxxxxxxx>]

I have installed Cube 2's for many clients.  No complaints.  I think that
the reason that you see so many posts on here regarding the RAQ stems from
the fact that these people are doing so much more with it then the Cube.
Yes, the RAQ itself is more complex and is used in far more complex and
demanding environments.

I use the Cube primarily as an email server.  None of my clients use it to
host their web site so I can't speak about it in this regard.

What is the main thing that you are trying to accomplish?  What are the
secondary goals?


-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 9:54 AM
To: Cobalt
Subject: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions


I am new to the list (2 days) and am considering a Qube2 for
my company's new facility.  Judging from the minute number of
posts to this list regarding the Qube, I can only assume that
either the Qube is MUCH more stable than the RAQ, it is much
less complex than the RAQ, there are MANY less units in use,
the sheer volumn of RAQ posts scares Qube users away, some
combination of the above, or there is some other reason that
I am unaware of.

Please feel free to enlighten me.

David Mitchell




_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users