[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ3 Update - OS Release 2.0
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ3 Update - OS Release 2.0
- From: Duncan Laurie <duncan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Feb 10 00:16:04 2000
- Organization: Cobalt Networks, Inc
The update was pulled because of reported problems with external storage,
but they weren't able to reproduce these problems in-house.. In the interim
they corrected a couple other found problems: active mointor forgetting the
state of services and a bug with NTP. I thought it was supposed to go up
today but it looks like it didn't make it.. Should be up again real soon now.
If anyone else had problems with external storage after installing the patch
let support know so they can pass that info along...
-duncan
Will DeHaan wrote:
>
> "Drew T. Nichols #333" wrote:
> >
> > Seems to me we need more communication from Cobalt. :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Drew
>
> I'm not a sustaining engineer by any means.. From what I've read this
> patch was pulled because it caused the RaQ 3 to forget external disk
> configurations as set in the Maintenance -> Add Storage interface. If
> that occured the RaQ 3 admin would have to reconfigure the additional
> drives and restore data from backups.
>
> -- Will
>
> >
> > > Toby,
> > >
> > > Hummm.. You're right, they have removed it.... They first removed all the
> > > individual patches last week and replaced 'em with the RaQ3 Update (OS
> > > Release 2.0). But you're correct, they've now removed the OS Release 2 and
> > > put back all the individual patches...
> > >
> > > I installed OS 2, and it seems to be okay.. no complaints..
> > >
> > > --BUT-- that damn security patch 2.2 that was posted for about 24 hours (if
> > > that) last week caused (cost) me a total WIPE of my system's HD.. It
> > > TOTALLY screwed my system/users for over 4 days! Live and learn...
> > >
> > > I'd still be interested in knowing why they've removed this one. Maybe to
> > > add the *revised* (and functional) 2.2 security patch to the OS upgrade..(?)
> > > Or possibly not..(?)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Craig Napier
> > >