[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-developers] email accounts
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-developers] email accounts
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Mar 26 08:08:00 2003
- List-id: Discussion Forum for developers on Sun Cobalt Networks products <cobalt-developers.list.cobalt.com>
DTH> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:30:04 -0500
DTH> From: "Dave @ The Hostworks"
DTH> Oh yes, thats WAY out of a single cobalt's league.. To
Indeed.
DTH> handle 60,000 active e-mail accounts you might want to look
DTH> into a cluster of servers, or atleast a HUGE single server
DTH> (dual processors etc..)
Simplying sending and receiving mail isn't CPU-intensive.
Sendmail slows down because of blocking on disk IO... using a
faster CPU just means it has that many more clock cycles to waste
doing nothing. ;-)
For a large mailserver, you need maildir. Mbox stinks. :-) Use
Postfix (my favorite) or qmail. A fast drive array is your
friend. Content-scanning services, such as spam filtering or AV,
are what will increase the need for CPU and/or memory.
For reliability purposes, more than one machine would be a good
idea...
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.