Re: [cobalt-developers] Re: OpenSSL - what state is this in?

["Dave Thurman (Mailing List Email)" <listonly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

on 9/20/02 3:37 AM, Ian McCall stated:

> 
>> Is this a Raq3??
> 
> It's a Raq 4.

If you have a Raq4 why not just grab the pkg from Solar Speed and save
yourself some time??
> 
> 
>> When I looked at our Raq3 they had about 3 symlinks in
>> the /usr/lib I think. You won't be able to just do a OpenSSL
>> compile. You need to build next to apache.
> 
> Thanks for the tip - I'll check the archives. I -believe- the web side of
> things
> is handled though through the mod_ssl upgrade I performed (compiled OpenSSL
> 0.9.6g, then compiled mod_ssl for 1.3.20 linked against OpenSSL 0.9.6g).
> 
> It's these extraneous files lying around that are worrying me - I don't know
> what's using them. Fixing the symlink or copying some files around is easy
> enough, the trouble is that I don't know why they're actually -there-, or what
> upgrade mechanism broke the links, or whether putting 0.9.6g in might break
> anything.

We also run Debian. The nice thing about them is on the web they actually
show the directory and location of the files. Even do a search for them.
Wish Cobalt would get with it.
> 
> DLL hell under Linux? Ah well, I knew it would happen one day...
> 
> Cheers,
> Ian

-- 
Thanks!!
Dave Thurman
The Web Presence Group / www.webpresencegroup.net
Listonly <at> webpresencegroup.net / Spam Block 8^Q