Re: [cobalt-users] Which RBL is Best ??

["Al-Juhani" <aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx>]

I use the below DNSBL and think spamcop.net, and njbl.org are the most
reliable.  I also use
rfc-ignorant.org because most of the Spam IPs (China) have bad whois and
that is according to
the spams I received before.

Below my December 2003 Spam Rejection Stats by each DNSBL (by number of
messages rejected)

spamcop.net ............ 568
njabl.org .............. 118
spamhaus.org ...........  65
rfc-ignorant.org ........ 44
dsbl.org ...............  31
ordb.org ...............  20


Al-Juhani
aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Franklin S Werren" <fswerren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 18:24
Subject: [cobalt-users] Which RBL is Best ??


> Hi All;
>
> This spam problem is causing my main server to stall at times when someone
> tries
> to use it as a relay or do a dictionary run... I have several Raq 4's and
a
> 550 as well as a a Raq 2.
>
> So which RBL or group of RBL's would work ???
>
> I have decided to take some action... and figure out how to add RBL's
> to my servers and not just use www.spampal.us (which works great!!)
> on my computers.
> Myself I am receiving 400+ spam messages a day.
> This problem also affects my customer base as well...
> and I hate to go this way since the spammers are not
> obeying the law!! (Some Law!! LOL)
>
> Lets get some comments here on the list on the problem and
> possible fixes including how to fix it on a Cobalt server.
>
>
> Franklin S. Werren  www.bagpipes.net   www.chautauqualake.net
> www.franksradio.net http://stvef.chautauqualake.net
> http://rtcw.chautauqualake.net