[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: Farwell to the Cobalt Community
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: Farwell to the Cobalt Community
- From: Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Dec 18 13:32:40 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Once upon a time, Dave Reid <daver1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> We decided on Free BSD because Red Hat 9 will no
> longer be supported past April 2004,
You should check the support date for FreeBSD 4.8 if that is a concern
to you. From http://www.FreeBSD.org/security/, the estimated EOL for
security updates for 4.8 is March 31, 2004. FreeBSD releases generally
have a 12 month support cycle (same as what Red Hat did for RHL 9).
If you want a stable platform with longer term support, check out Red
Hat Enterprise Linux (with a 5 year support cycle). If you want free
support for RHL, check out the Fedora Legacy project (currently
targeting RHL 7.3 and 9 for longer term support).
If you want stable SMP support, you'll probably want Linux (or
Slowaris/x86) instead of *BSD, although FreeBSD does have some SMP
support available now.
> and I have been told by their tech
> support that FreeBSD is far more stable than any Red Hat based platform
> and much faster
Both of those tend to be matters of some debate, with both sides
pointing their way. I had a Linux (RHL 6.2) database server that ran
for 1341 days (over 3.6 years) without a reboot; I only had to shut it
down because we moved the NOC.
> and of course it is true Unix, not Linux.
No, *BSD is not "true Unix". Only AT&T based code is "true Unix" (i.e.
Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, SCO Unixware). As part of the settlement of the
AT&T/BSD lawsuit, the BSD core code was stripped clean of AT&T code.
That's what set the *BSD versions back and when Linux got started
(otherwise there probably never would have been a Linux).
Today, anything that passes a set of tests can use the trademark and
call itself "Unix", but to my knowledge, neither FreeBSD nor Linux has
done this. I think one of the Europe-based Linux distributions was
working on this, but I don't think they succeeded (there are a few
things that Linux just does different because the standard is stoopid).
The only major non-AT&T Unix-like system that I know of to pass the
tests and be called Unix is DEC OSF/1 aka Digital Unix aka Compaq Tru64
Unix aka HP Tru64 Unix (which started out as a BSD based system).
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.