[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Raq2 Network IP Address Configuration
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Raq2 Network IP Address Configuration
- From: "Darryl Hafermalz" <dhafermalz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Jul 28 20:07:02 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Now that I've gotten my IP issue resolved at the ISP, I'm "peeling" the
onion as I have encountered another problem.
I have been assigned block of public IP addresses that do not have
traditional 8 bit boundaries. Here is what I have been assigned -
207.142.10.101 Gateway /29
207.142.10.102 MIA-9012
207.142.10.103 MIA-9012
207.142.10.104 MIA-9012
207.142.10.105 MIA-9012
207.142.10.106 MIA-9012
207.142.10.107 Broadcast
Subnet: 255.255.255.248
However, my Raq thinks the network setup is as follows -
207.142.10.96 Gateway /29
207.142.10.97 MIA-9012
207.142.10.98 MIA-9012
207.142.10.99 MIA-9012
207.142.10.100 MIA-9012
207.142.10.101 MIA-9012
207.142.10.102 Broadcast
Subnet: 255.255.255.248
As a result, I have only one IP address usable for hosts - 102.
The raq is assuming that my 8 address block is in the 12th block of
addresses starting from zero. Here is an example of what my eth0:0 looks
like -
IPADDR=207.142.10.103
NETWORK=207.142.10.96
NETMASK=255.255.255.248
BROADCAST=207.142.10.103
The gateway address, as set in the gui, is set to 207.142.10.101 which
allows the 102 address to work correctly.
How would I correct this problem if the ISP relegates me to this grouping of
addresses? If I manually correct the eth0:0 file, there is no improvement
in the situation.
Confusing enough?
Thanks
Darryl L. Hafermalz
West Atlantic Networks