[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] chmod



> You did mean 664 :)
>
> Minor technicality - it is really OCTAL (base 8) not binary - the 664 is
> the octal representation of the (binary) bits. >
> Okay, I'm getting really technical, but I was an assembly language
> programmer for many years on octal-based systems. I may not know how to
> make a web page file list display full width (well I do now), but I do
know
> my octal arithmetic. I do that math in my head :)
>

Don't know about assembly language, but for the Linux  644 worked fine.