[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] excessive spam
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] excessive spam
- From: daniel anliker <support@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Jul 14 08:25:01 2003
- Organization: http://www.netland.ch
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
what about spamcop.net, is it down ?
in last time i have many problems to access this website.
Ian schrieb:
> On 14 Jul 2003 at 15:29, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
>
> >
> > >> Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
> > >> Blocking IPs, by the way, is a waste of time.
> > >
> > > Really? That's how most of the DNSBL's work. If you block 68.56.0.0/16
> > > you'll reject a ton of open proxy spam from Comcast users. RR.com was
> > > nice enough to send me their list of DHCP addresses.
> >
> > I was referring to individual IPs. Using RDBLs etc., is a lot more dynamic
> > and useful. For example, if you were hooked up to Spamcop you would block
> > the IPs currently in the database and ONLY those IPs. If you were to dump
> > a load of IPs into your sendmail config and block them you could end up:
> > 1. Blocking IPs that are either no longer active and/or no longer guilty
> > of spamming
> >
> >
> > 2. You wouldn't block any new IPs
> >
> > We use spamcop with infinite monkeys and have a very high success rate.
>
> Same here, both in sendmail and mailscanner, just in case any slip
> through.
>
> I have also set up a basic perl script to scan yesterdays maillog and
> generate a report of the rejected IPs/domains. Just in case any
> customers have been blocked, none so far.
>
> Ian
> --
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--
Anliker Daniel
web -> http://www.netland.ch
mail -> danliker@xxxxxxxxxx
ICQ# -> 131527875