[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Editing sendmail.cf (was: mailscanner on raq550 gives an error)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Editing sendmail.cf (was: mailscanner on raq550 gives an error)
- From: SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Jun 22 08:05:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Hi Jeff,
At 15:49 21-06-2003 -0700, Jeff Lasman wrote:
Sendmail also recommends you buy their commercial package. You don't
have to take sendmail's recommendations as gospel; you can implement
your own and do it your way.
I am not referring to sendmail.com. :) I have seen a lot of people
encountering problems upgrading to a new version because the previous admin
did things his/her way.
Whether the "hacks" are in sendmail.cf or the m4 files, they're still
there; you can read them in either place.
It takes longer to read through the sendmail.cf and see whether it was
hacked or not. :)
No, that makes it difficult to customize sendmail using m4. We have no
problem customizing sendmail by writing the sendmail.cf file; I've been
making changes directly to the sendmail.cf file since at least 1994,
probably earlier.
I don't understand your statement about how it is more difficult to
customize sendmail using m4. If you want to add a new feature, it's a
matter of adding one line to the .mc and using m4 to generate the sendmail.cf.
I understand that a lot of people don't want to take the time to learn
the ins and outs of the sendmail.cf file; I feel the same way about m4,
which was to have been a universal configuration language but which
appears to only be used by sendmail.
m4 is not only used by sendmail. It is still used in configuration
scripts. A lot of people won't take the time to learn how to administer
their server. :) The sendmail.cf is the reason why people shy away from
sendmail. You don't have to understand the m4 language to use m4 and
generate the sendmail.cf.
Regards,
-sm