[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Are Raq3i's and 4i's really that bad
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Are Raq3i's and 4i's really that bad
- From: Sean Warburton <sean_warburton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu May 1 07:22:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
I just read a post saying that one of you guys is jumping ship because
the Raq is dead in the water, unsupported by Sun and full of
vulnerabilities.
Are the Raq 3 and 4 really that bad, I have just purchased 4 brand new
raq3i's (I have upgraded them to Raq 4r) and 2 brand new Raq 4i
(upgraded to Raq 4r) all of which have 512mb of RAM and dual 30GB
drives, they will run below a load balancer serving CGI generated web
pages (pulling information from a database server and file server
(NAS)). I still haven't paid (or received) 4 of these machine and
despite getting them for a good price, before I go and blow my money
I'd appreciate your honest opinions.
TIA