[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] every added domain on wrong interface
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] every added domain on wrong interface
- From: Josh Kuperman <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Apr 10 08:56:31 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:16:55AM -0400, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> r
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Josh Kuperman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:07:21AM -0400, Gerald Waugh wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Josh Kuperman wrote:
> > >
> > > On RaQs
> > > eth0 is connected to the Internet.
> > > eth1 is connected to the Intranet.
> > > On Qubes it's the opposite.
> > >
> > Hunh??
> > 1. is this documented somewhere?
>
> Yes it is documented, in the RaQ and Qube manuals.
I printed out the Sun Cobalt(TM) RaQ(TM) XTR server appliance User
Manual. And so far the closest thing I can find is a reference to the
primary network. All the examples use 10.x.x.x IPs or in the DNS
appendix 192.168.x.x IPs.
>
> > 2. can I safely switch my entries for net1 and net2?
>
> If you want to admin the server without the GUI yoy
> can do most anything.
If I wanted to admin the server without the GUI and autoupdates I
would have bought a cheap-o from TigerDirect -- which some days seems
like a good idea.
> > 3. can I manually alter the network-scripts?
>
> Sure, but using the GUI just might overwrite your changes.
>
> > 4. shouldn't I be able to add subdomains to my intranet, too?
>
> Not sure, I don't think the system is setup for that, but it might
> work.
> The eth1 interface is normally used for backups and local traffic.
>
> I have setup masquerading and port forwarding on RaQs, but the
> servers on eth1 used the server's NAT for sending and port forwarding
> for receiving.
NAT seems to work fine regardless as does access to the sites that are
aliased on the wrong port -- this makes sense because as long as a
route is available and the machine is on the network it should work.
Indeed if it wasn't for needing to access another site being hosted by
the same ISP, using a subnet of the same 1.2.3.x net - I would never
have noticed the misconfiguration, or that all the sites were going up
on the wrong eth.
--
Josh Kuperman
josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx