[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Acceptance of domain literals problem
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Acceptance of domain literals problem
- From: David Lucas <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Mar 16 15:30:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
At 03:17 PM 3/16/2003, you wrote:
Santiago Montalvan wrote:
> The server is not a Raq, it is a Qube3 Professional with all patches
> installed including the one released today for the updated root servers.
I can't compare it against a good Qube3 but perhaps someone else will
volunteer.
> If you want to take a look again go to
> http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=brattain.com. I have
> noticed that for example solarspeed.net has the same problem. Is this
> really something I should be concerned about?
I've installed the Stauber update on RaQ3s, RaQ4s, and Raq 550s, and
have seen the problem on our only RaQ3. I don't have another RaQ3 to
look at it against <frown>, and I don't know if it had it before.
Do you have DNS enabled on all or none of the Raq's?
I had mine disabled and got the warning. I enabled it and it went away.
The reason it's a problem is because RFC 1123 5.2.17 requires it. And
that's good enough.
I _am_ going to try to find the problem on the RaQ3 I've got.
Is it going to affect functionality of your mail server? No.
Am I worried about to do it this moment? No.
I hope this answers your questions.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980
Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only
To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"
_____________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.