[cobalt-users] .med tld - ICANN RESPONSE

["aljuhani" <aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx>]

Keeping the Internet a Reliable Global Public Resource:

http://www.icann.org/icp/icp-3-background/response-to-new.net-09jul01.htm

http://www.icann.org/correspondence/levee-letter-to-schecter-23jul01.htm

Al-Juhani
aljuhani@xxxxxxxxx

======= Original Message =======

  From: Dan Kriwitsky cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wed Feb 26 09:43:29 2003 
  Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] .med tld - which method is best?

> > > > Sounds like a bit of a scam.
> > > >
> > > > <quote from www.new.net website>
> 
> EXACTLY what I said after I learned more about this *supposed tld*.
> 
> I understand that your ISP has to be new.net enabled OR you need the 
> browser plugin to enable your own system.
> 
> For the cost of the domain name I don't mind having it, but a scam??? 
> YES!!!!!!!
> 
> Back to my question - so only my ISP where I host my RAQ has 
> to make the 
> bind changes, not me on my RAQ which only runs dns for its 
> own sites???
> 

You shouldn't need to do anything different than you do for any .com
site you add to DNS.
It certainly won't help anyone see it though.
-- 
C2003 Dan Kriwitsky

Please reply to the list only. Off list replies are not read.