RE: [cobalt-users] Very Slow RAQ4

["Phil Jones" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah - I've tried that already, but running top is
taking for ever at the moment. There don't appear
to be any visible processes hogging resources. What
would be considered an acceptable % for memory usage?
 - the highest figure we have (by some way) is 16.6%
for caspeng.

Any other ideas?


-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bruce Timberlake
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:09 PM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Very Slow RAQ4


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Sorry for being a bit basic, but we've got a RAQ4 that is slowly
> grinding to a halt. Web pages and database queries do eventually
> complete, but they are taking longer and longer.
>
> I realise the cause could be almost anything - but has anyone got
> any ideas what to check first on the server? There must be some
> process somewhere taking up a hell of a lot of resources

Shell in and run 'top', then press 'P' to sort by CPU usage or 'M' to 
sort by RAM usage.

Does Active Monitor ever send out a low memory alert?

- -- 
Bruce Timberlake

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+N+BqvLA2hUZ9kgwRAn3NAJ9rY5l9dXSqszStJdEEeA+GWOPooQCfZ03p
3LTfk02p7nQ/13EOEiVYlLU=
=G/tm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_____________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users