[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] using the same passwords for everything



SW> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:37:36 -0500
SW> From: Steve Werby


SW> Eddy, thanks for the extensive list.  Frankly, I only have
SW> experience with LDAP, PAM and Kerberos, but Eddy's right on

Someone also should point out that some of these have different
niches:

Kerberos (KerberosIV and KRB5) is intended to provide secure auth
in an untrusted network.  LDAP is more of a network information
database, like NIS/YP.  libnss[*], PAM, and SASL are plugin-based
layers to help alleviate the N^2 problem.

Sometimes one uses a combination of the above.  Other times not.
This area gets very muddy very quickly; I strongly advise people
to review the different options.

[*] This is one are where my beloved FreeBSD lags behind Linux.
    nsswitch can be very helpful in larger/centralized security
    systems.  Bear in mind, however, the increased risk -- and
    corresponding need for security -- when using such a setup.


SW> the money and I hope it didn't appear I was suggesting LDAP
SW> was the only mechanism available.

I took your post as a suggestion highlighting that with which
you've had good luck, for those who want to "get right down to
business". :-)

IMHO, this is something of an underdeveloped area... many of the
options "come close", but they all could improve.  Configuring
LDAPv3 is an interesting experience, especially the first time.


Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.