[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Sun Fire V100/V120
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Sun Fire V100/V120
- From: "Mike's List" <mikelist@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Jan 9 08:02:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Maybe someone should lobby Sun to release the OS to white boxes, however,
if you want to enable ChiliSoft ASP --30 days trial, afterwards a serial
number base on your ethernet MAC, etc.
This way Sun stills selling the software, ie. ASP or whatever, and users
get the Cobalt UI. Hey it's a long shot, but what else is Sun going to
do with the UI.
- Mike
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Bruce Timberlake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Not sure if this as been discussed before, but search for Sun Fire
> > V100 doesn't turn up anything, but was wondering if Sun has plans
> > on migrating the stuff on Cobalt onto Sun Fire V100/V120/etc.?
> >
> > Anyone at Sun cares to elaborate? I like the Sparc platform
> > w/Solaris. How about selling the V100 with all the bell and
> > whistles of the Cobalt. ie. Exact web interface management and so
> > on, but instead of an Intel or AMD w/Linux, it'll be Sparc
> > w/Solaris. V100/V120 is a nice platform.
> >
> > Just thought I throw something out for discussion, and perhaps
> > someone at Sun pick this up and run with it???
>
> I can't comment officially, but I don't believe it is a plan of record
> (at least it wasn't in November 2002). Appliances in general are
> pretty much dead as far as Sun's concerned. They are focusing on
> Linux on 'white boxes' (like LX50) and blades, and on their new
> 'Desktop' product (whatever that turns out to be). Everything but
> the 550 has either been EOL'd or probably will be very soon. Almost
> all of the 'old' Cobalt people left are on Sun Linux and LX50 teams
> now. Not many (any?) people doing any support work for the older
> products, and I don't believe anything new is in the works...
>
> Sun management was always very intent on keeping Linux/Intel separate
> in as many ways as possible from anything Solaris/SPARC. Having a
> low-end Solaris-based appliance would be too much of a marketing
> disaster for them to try and spin.
>
> For what it's worth, early on in the acquisition there was a LOT of
> interest in porting the Cobalt UI to Solaris to make the darn things
> easier to handle. Solaris engineers were continually amazed at how
> quickly I could set up a Qube/RaQ/etc, and wished aloud many times
> that Solaris were that easy...
>
> - --
> Bruce Timberlake
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+HJzjvLA2hUZ9kgwRAj+KAJ9a02/OfJ7mH8UOCrU0HS4ZiRM9HwCfbl1F
> uJzSKVtwdePcBvk/cyDaSLc=
> =WXcE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>