[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ4R IP issue
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ4R IP issue
- From: "jim st john" <jim@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Jan 5 17:52:00 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
This range of addresses is not on an even boundary. Your range is
probably
x.x.x.96-x.x.x.111. If your netmask is 255.255.255.240 then you cannot
have
an ip range of 100-115. If your netmask is 255.255.255.224 then it's
possible to have that range but not likely.
-jim-
-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Kriwitsky
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:46 PM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ4R IP issue
> I have a 16 IP addresses, they range XXX.XXX.XXX.100 - XXX.XXX.XXX.115
>
> Everything on 100-111 IP addresses works fine, the name of
> the server was gold prior to OS restore, now it is called
> www, don't know how this effects anything. Since the rebuild
> I have added to virtual sites on IP 112 and 113. Neither of
> these new domains respond to pings, further my RAQ4R does not
> seem to respond to pings directly to the IP addresses 112 and
> 113. IP addresses from 100 to 111 all work fine.
Were there previous sites using 112 and 113? Are you sure your ISP is
properly routing those IP's? Sounds like they're not if you can't even
ping them.
Just try adding test.domain.com in your DNS using one of those IPs with
an existing working domain and see what happens.
--
C2002 Dan Kriwitsky
Please reply to the list only. Off list replies are not read.
_____________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users