[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Fwd: Re: OSRCD License Agreement
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Fwd: Re: OSRCD License Agreement
- From: "SteelHead" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Nov 11 19:07:01 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
sounds similar in result to my response the other day.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: <jale@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:01 PM
Subject: [cobalt-users] Fwd: Re: OSRCD License Agreement
> Well, this lawyer is a very good friend ... my first comment, I hate
> lawyers. As one of my other friends (yes, I have 2) calls them *lieyers*.
> But this lawyer is a truly good guy, even if his answer does suck (for all
> of us). I think Sun should pay Gerald a lot of money to create them a
> usable system :)
>
> But here is what my free legal advice reported back to me tonight (he
> doesn't totally understand the whole open source thing of Linux, so don't
> take all his comments completely literally):
>
> >Well, you're right; it doesn't look good. At least on its face, the
license
> >prohibits any modification of any kind. Whatever Cobalt may be doing
with
> >Redhat Linux, it's probably by agreement between those two parties. Even
if
> >it's not, and Cobalt is itself violating Redhat's license, your friend is
> >probably not thereby outside the provisions of the Cobalt license. As to
> >your suggestion of having Gerald do his magic, I can't tell you that it
> >wouldn't violate the license, because it would. Whether Cobalt would
care
> >is a separate question. You might start talks with Cobalt to see if
they'll
> >grant Gerald a separate license to do his thing.
>
> Jale
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>