[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Re: is this what we've been discussing - CERT Advisory CA-2002-27 Apache/mod_ssl Worm
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Re: is this what we've been discussing - CERT Advisory CA-2002-27 Apache/mod_ssl Worm
- From: "Dave Thurman (Mailing List Email)" <listonly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Sep 15 15:25:00 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
on 9/15/02 5:09 PM, E.B. Dreger stated:
> DT> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:44:44 -0500
> DT> From: Dave Thurman
>
>
> DT> > /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.a
> DT> Isn't that badboy from the non-cobalt install??
>
> No. The .a extension indicates an ar-created archive that gets
> linked into an executable. Compare with a .so dynamic module.
>
> You can delete .a files and run a system just fine, although
> compiling will be a problem. Not so with .so files; delete those
> and dynamically-linked binaries are hosed.
>
> Note that the above paragraph gives some hints as to the
> mechanism by which upgrades must be applied.
>
>
I meant the badboy as my attempt at humor:)
So what does a person do to write to the proper ssl to upgrade. I see what
you are I think saying about a possible overwrite messing with the depends'
--
Thanks!!
Dave Thurman
The Web Presence Group / www.webpresencegroup.net
Listonly <at> webpresencegroup.net / Spam Block 8^Q