[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
Could anyone tell me the difference between the two versions of this on the
OpenSSL homepage.
- openssl-0.9.6e.tar.gz
- openssl-engine-0.9.6e.tar.gz
Thanks again all and wish me luck!
MJM
>From: Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: cobalt-users <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] opensll - static and dynamic linking
>Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
>
>On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, cobalt raq4 wrote:
>
> > I have updated our openssl for dynamically linked apps such as stunnel
>on
> > our box. I have been doing my homework and would dearly like some
> > verification from one of the guru's out there that the following is
>correct.
> >
> > OpenSSH and Apache = Statically linked, therefore these need recompiling
> > from new versions which include the OpenSSL libaries.
> >
> > Stunnel etc = Dynamically linked, these use the version of OpenSSL
>currently
> > on the box.
> >
> > What I want to verify is:
> > Now i have updated OpenSSH to 'openssl-0.9.6e' this secures my stunnel
>as
> > the dynamic links are to a safe version of OpenSSH.
> >
>
>You have to upgrade openssl as the OpenSSH package is static linked to
>openssl-0.9.6e, and stunnel is dynamic linked
>
>ssh into your RaQ and issue
>[admin admin]$ openssl
>OpenSSL> version
>OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002
>OpenSSL> quit
>
>--
>Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>http://frontstreetnetworks.com | Website Hosts & SOHO Networks
>229 Front Street, Ste.#C, New Haven, CT. 06513 United States
>voice +1 203-785-0699 | fax +1 203-785-1787
>
>_____________________________________
>cobalt-users mailing list
>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com