[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] Re: Searching the Archives - was (Webalizer)
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Re: Searching the Archives - was (Webalizer)
- From: "Jonothon Ortiz \(Xnext, Inc\)" <jon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Jul 3 20:48:00 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
>> Are you kidding? I'd just like to see some explaination as to >> what the
>> funky version numbers/secret key numbers on those things >>
>> mean. It's
>> unnecessarily confusing to have undated patch releases with
>> seckret-decoder-ring naming schemes (a 4.x patch patching a
>> 5.x system?). I
>> mean, geez, assuming the target market for Cobalt machines is >> the
appliance
>> operator, what's with the obtuse version number/names?
While we're at it we can also ask that the updates follow some sort of
ascending order..it's a pain in the butt when you have to install patch
XXXXX749 when you know you have patch XXXXX750 =\