RE: [cobalt-users] Re: Getting the source to Cobalt updates

["Gavin Nelmes-Crocker" <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> What I'd _really_ like to see is the actual source RPMs for 
> the stuff that is Open Source (I understand that some stuff 
> like the bandwidth module is Cobalt close source).
>

try here  ftp://ftp.cobalt.com/pub/rpms/kernel/

> In my case, the kernel SRPM would be _very_ useful.  The 
> difference between the two above kernels is a LOT more than 
> just the simple security fix, including a bunch of changes to 
> the eepro100 driver (which has always been a tempermental 
> driver in Linux due to Intel's policies). I suspect that 
> Cobalt/Sun doesn't have a test setup like my real-world 
> network that had problems, so my problems weren't seen.
> In an ideal world (hah!), there'd be a directory tree like:

<snip>
 
> raq3/RaQ3-All-Kernel-4.0.1.216C28III/kernel-2.2.16C28_III-2.src.rpm
> raq3/RaQ3-All-Kernel-4.0.1-2.2.16C32III-4/kernel-2.2.16C32_III
> -2.src.rpm

well look here as well its as near as you asked 

ftp://ftp.cobalt.com/pub/products/raq4/SRPMS/

and 

ftp://ftp.cobalt.com/pub/products/raq3/SRPMS/

All on the main ftp site as well - may not have everything and I know
that some of the files are miss catalogued after doing the patch for
Qpopper the RaQ4 version is actually under the RaQ3 listing and its
possible that the exact kernel you want is not there in which case email
on the developer list which I think will get picked up by Geoff
Baysinger who I think from a bit of deduction is who Bruce was referring
to as the person in charge of sorting it all out and making it clearer
for all.

Regards

Gavin