[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Motherboard Supplier?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Motherboard Supplier?
- From: error404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed Jun 12 05:07:54 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
At 07:13 12/06/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Lets get this thing on a thread of its own...
There is a review here
http://www.linuxdevices.com/products/PD9266751279.html
The manufacturer
http://www.viavpsd.com/product/epia_mini_itx_spec.jsp?motherboardId=21
OK, since it has it's own thread......
I have been playing / working with "industrial" PC hardware for a few years
now....
Late last year I started getting dissatisfied with RAQ preformance, and
having opened them up in the past (more ram etc) I was *very* much reminded
of a lot of the custom boards made by people like www.advantech.com
The main differences being that for "our" application (we servers) we need
something that combines low thermal rejection / power consumption with a 1U
format, where either / or pretty much described the choices available, and
not having Cobalt style financial backing a custom mainboard was out of the
question (but whoever was behind the original idea I can empathise with,
and given the volume made I can see the huge financial margins that must
have been made on the hardware) so it remained pretty much a back burner
idea while my RAQs effectively depreciated in the relative performance stakes
Then this VIA Eden came along, immediately it looked like just the job, so
I chased their tech dept and ensured that the hardware was fully compatible
with Red Hat (7.2 at the time) and they said it was. So I got one and
upgraded a RAQ2 that had been relegated to SOHO development use and was
largely even then being neglected because of the MIPS limitations. It
worked _brilliantly_ full GUI either by plugging monitor / keyboard into
the back, or remotely over the network, so a full Gnome / KDE interface.
980 bogomips puts it *bang* up with a RAQ4 and my mini-tower AMD 450 server
that was dragooned in for SOHO development work where the RAQ2 MIPS didn't
cut it.
This is a _seriously_ impressive upgrade for something that costs UK£80 and
takes a couple of hours to botch.
I have been back in touch with VIA and their Distro channel and appraised
them of all the above, and said that I would like to do the whole process
again, but this time no botches, do the job properly with step by step
documentation such that anyone with half a brain could repeat it. VIA /
Distro of course know a good thing for sales when they hear it, so they
have promised me some mainboard to do this with (the initial euro
allocation of (I believe) 100,000 units of these things sold like hotcakes)
and in return I have promised to "open source" the complete documentation
of the process and host it only my only remaining on-line RAQ2 at
http://213.38.74.211/
Since the Cobalt GUI is SUn/Cobalt specific I will take this as far as
getting a running web/mail server and installing Plesk
Due to the nature of this project anyone who goes this route should
understand a few things.
1/ You are _NOT_ going to end up with _ANY_ cobalt product.
2/ You are _NOT_ going to end up with a server product that uses the Cobalt
GUI. (unless you wanna port it yourself)
3/ You are _NOT_ going to end up with _ANY_ sort of warranty as a server
appliance.
4/ You are _NOT_ going to be able to use the Cobalt front panel interface
LCD / buttons. (unless you wanna breadboard it)
5/ You _ARE_ going to end up with an _EXTREMELY_ cheap and viable
alternative to throwing and RAQ2 on the scrapheap, or converting a RAQ2 or
RAQ3 or RAQ4 into a server that bogomip wise is on a par with a RAQ4, but
uses all generic (therefore cheap) PC hardware (eg RAM etc) without being
fussy, and which will run a "proper" full GUI interface and the very latest
Red Hat 7.3 / PHP / MySQL / etc / etc while still retaining the physical 1U
form factor of the original Cobalt enclosure and the low thermal (and
noise) rejection required for a server appliance.
6/ In effect, your donor RAQ is donating the 1U case itself, the PSU, the
hard disk (if you choose to retain it) and bugger all else. (basically you
just throw away (or sell) the Cobalt mainboard) Given that a fully working
original RAQ2 on e-bay is cheaper than a new 1U case, this makes
_excellent_ sense. For a RAQ3/4 it makes less financial sense, so you need
one of the other reasons such as wanting Gnome, or wanting to replace a
dead Cobalt mainboard instead of buying a whole new Cobalt XTR
7/ You will end up with a "home brew" server, not a Cobalt, which I have
chosen to call an "XRAQ2" as in "Ex-RAQ2"
I do not see this as a viable or likely alternative to buying a new Cobalt
product, particularly for someone who wants to run a full 72U cabinet full
of identical hardware.
I do see this as a viable alternative to simply throwing away an otherwise
non-upgradeable and pretty obsolete server product, which is sinful to
waste. It is entirely up to you whether you feel happy putting it back into
commercial service, it wouldn't bother me.
Once you undertake this course of action, unless you own other, standard,
Cobalt products too, then this list ceases to be appropriate.
Once you undertake this course of action then any and all support for the
"XRAQ" should be gotten somewhere other than this list / Cobalt
I have thought about the legal aspects of this, Sun / Cobalt doesn't seem
to have the _slightest_ interest in obsolete equipment such as the RAQ2,
and since I am personally not going to throw away a 4 year old RAQ2 and buy
a RAQ550 to replace it there are no other options available within Cobalt
corporate space, so I don't see that this is hurting anyone or costing
Cobalt any money....
cheers
--
================================
jb@xxxxxxxxxxxx / www.surfbaud.org / 2002
================================